Case Study of H.B. Fuller Essay

Question No 1 Is H.B.Fuller responsible for the addiction of street children to its Resistol products? Do you agree or disagree with the statement that the social conditions in Honduras and Guatemala ar ultimately responsible for misuse of H.B. Fuller products and that neither the product nor the telephoner is to blame? Do you agree or disagree that a advert telephoner is not responsible for the activities of its subsidiaries? Explain your answers full. a) I dont think that H.B.Fuller is responsible. Because the occasion is that theyre righteous doing their business and nothing else. Its their right to do whatever business they need. It is just like that when you go to the well, if the dog fell into the well so what we fire do accordingly? The company is just concerned with the business of producing gumwood. To maintain the status of the company, they involve to use best chemicals out of best. It is the duty of the company to maintain the quality. If in that respect isnt any substitute of that glue then theyre help slight.They cant hang their company. b) If we talk astir(predicate) the children who were affected by the vestments of sniffing the glue, children can understand what is right and what is wrong if theyre the part of the company. If theyre sniffing the glue, it is up to them. caller never said about that. To sniff the glue is their action why the company should be blame? c) Of course Im agreeing with the statement that H.B.Fuller is not responsible for the activities of its subsidiary. To let the children know about the duties and precaution is the responsibility of the company. If the children are habitual of this thing, then I just want to say that its very hard to get relieve of any type addiction. One more thing that I want to discuss is that when Im drinker then whats the trouble with you? I know about the side effects of this thing. So in this case, company isparent it is right but theyre not taking work from the children for the sake of Allah. Company is paying for what they are doing for the business. Question No 2 In your judgment did H.B.Fuller conduct itself in a chastely appropriate manner? Explain your answer. In my point of view, Its I think a good step which the company taken that they stop selling of that glue in small jars. If the glue is available in small jars, children have the maximum chance to buy that glue because it is low-cost for them.When the company is selling that glue in large size of containers, it becomes frequently easier to protect the children from using the glue. Because large size of containers must not be in reach of children. Well not go for utilitarianism because life is the only thing which is priceless. Company should care about the health of children. They did a good tune but it costs the company very much. After all they are running their business in a very large eggshell having revenue more than $1 Billion (1995). They have found the expert way to protect thems elves from winding up the company.Question No 3 What, if anything, should the company have done that it did not do? After considering the hale case, we have got whateverthing which is not done by the company but the company should do. The company should advice the children about the use of this glue and also aware the presidential term about this product. I think, after advising the children there might be less chances of spreading disease. Children could be protected from the harmful outcomes. There are some more points which should be taken into the account by the company Company should mention the precautions on their product about the utilisation of the product. Company should go the campaign regarding the usage of the product. Company should advice the children time to time about the usage and drawbacks of the product.